Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT
That is a morally bankrupt argument. It's like saying that nothing is lost if you sneak into the cinema without paying, or nothing is lost if you get on a train without a ticket. In all these activities, you are taking advantage of the fact that the content or service has been created for people who do pay.
|
Could you explain why it is morally corrupt. Are you using a consequence ethics as a model? Or what theory are you using as a foundation to come to the conclusion that it is morally corrupt and how did you arrive at that conclusion?
Your examples are not equivalent since the cause problems less enjoyment for paying customers.