Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaggy
It's interesting that you pointed out that my opinion was invalid because I have no direct knowledge of it, and yet your opinion is valid. I assume that means you have direct knowledge?
I also didn't realize that saying I envied your naivete was "calling you a name". I apologize if you took it personally. That was certainly not my intent.
|
Calling someone naive is a bit of name calling in my view.
My point with the board of directors thing is that they would be the only body that would actually know if they were implementing certain business practices for a particular reason (such as to deprive the consumer of rights).
In discussions such as these there are always assumptions and points of view. As I see it you are advocating only from the consumer point of view and attempting to paint the enemy as evil which may or may not be true.
I'm trying to stand up more for the rights of the creator of works that make all this possible. (and yes unfortunately the publishers are in the middle of it).