View Single Post
Old 12-29-2009, 02:02 PM   #288
kjk
.
kjk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kjk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kjk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kjk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kjk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kjk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kjk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kjk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kjk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kjk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.kjk ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 3,408
Karma: 5647231
Join Date: Oct 2008
Device: never enough
Quote:
Originally Posted by kennyc View Post
No. It's inherently different, that's why we are dealing with all these issues. It's not a matter of will, it's a matter of inherent differences. It's much the same issue as the music industry just went through and we're re-hashing it in the book publishing world.
I don't disagree that going from physical books to digital books will necessitate change from both sides. What I don't agree with is using examples like "live theatre to TV" or "horses to cars" as a reasonable explanation as to why.

We understand the differences between watching live theatre and watching TV because there is a real tradeoff.

Saying that we have to give up book sharing or reselling because of the move to digital is an artificial tradeoff. There is nothing inherent about the move to digital that precludes the possibility. There is everything inherent about the move from live theatre (and horses) to TV (and cars) that necessitates a change in attitude and behavior.


That is where the tension arises, and why I think those are terrible examples.
kjk is offline   Reply With Quote