View Single Post
Old 12-28-2009, 10:02 PM   #213
tompe
Grand Sorcerer
tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.tompe ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 7,452
Karma: 7185064
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Linköpng, Sweden
Device: Kindle Voyage, Nexus 5, Kindle PW
Quote:
Originally Posted by Elfwreck View Post
I don't know if "pay by reviews" would work (especially if that's online reviews... I would expect a surge in review-writing bot programs), but there are ways to measure popularity--TV manages to do *something* with Nielsen ratings.

I expect that, if we moved to (or added) "arts/progress tax + pay by popularity" for paying authors/ artists/ scientists/ programmers/ etc., we'd have some bumpy years of trying to figure out how to do that fairly, followed by a long run of, well, more-or-less effective payment methods. If that's how we decide to pay them, we'll sort out methods that encourage them to produce good works.
I thought about Nielsen ratings when I suggested that you paye people to evaluate things.

The system does not have to be fair. The current system is not fair according to my fairness criteria. We only need some system that works and that is accepted by people. And to be accepted the system only have to appear to be not too unfair.
tompe is offline   Reply With Quote