Quote:
Originally Posted by msundman
I was correct, you made an invalid logical induction. It was not a definition of copyright. Specifically, I did not say that copyright is only defining what people are forbidden to do with their property. (Copyright certainly also limits things that are not (natural) property, and I'm fully aware of this fact, so I would never say otherwise.)
|
Aha, sorry for misunderstanding you. The induction was based on some observations from other comments also but I think I jumped to a bad conclusion here which was a bit careless of me.