Quote:
Originally Posted by msundman
No, it does not. I'm not sure whether you're making wrong inductions or are confusing implication with equivalence, but something wrong is certainly happening in your reasoning.
|
No, I do not think so. What I tried to do was to show that your original statement:
Quote:
|
Copyright is defining what people are forbidden to do with their property, i.e. copyright is an incursion into natural property rights.
|
is wrong if read as a definition of what copyright is. Copyright also forbid what you can do with the content of your memory which I do not consider to be property in the meaning you used the word.