Minie, thanks for your clarification. Sometimes humor doesn't come across in writing as we intend.
Folks, let's try to keep this civil. It is clear that quite a few people are unhappy with iRex, and they may be justified or not, but arguing about it here isn't going to change anything. As this thread was started to report possible action by iRex, let's restrict conversation here to further information about that possibility, rather than criticism of each others positions.
Examples:
"I think this rumor is likely to be true because of this fact about law in the Netherlands...." OK.
"I think anyone who expects iRex to compensate them is..." Let's not go there. That's an
ad hominem attack and against our Guidelines.