Quote:
Originally Posted by DawnFalcon
...
I've looked at one yes (and compared to a 505 and a 600), but it's widely reported to be the case as as well. Like, the vast majority of people who've used one. What's your agenda on this?
|
no agenda simply asking why you feel as you do...I also did not care for the setup but would not have gone so far as to say/imply it was not a worthwhile device. I did not find the screen worse that the 500 and only slightly different than the 505. My dislike was that the touch functionality was poorly implemented but not from a standpoint of readability, that part was OK in good light. I don't care for pretty much any eink brand display made so far because the contrast is not great with most fonts. A few seem better, but as a rule I do not care for the current panels at all. But everyone is different. Better to explain why than to simply say/infer a device is just bad. I could not care a flip about the "conventional wisdom" or what "
everybody is saying" about a device, what matters is how it works FOR ME not anyone else. Observations on a device are what I find helpful.
Sorry if asking you to support your "sound byte" was out of line with your sense of what is OK. You know...like...what I mean?
