View Single Post
Old 12-22-2009, 11:46 AM   #16
calvin-c
Guru
calvin-c ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.calvin-c ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.calvin-c ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.calvin-c ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.calvin-c ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.calvin-c ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.calvin-c ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.calvin-c ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.calvin-c ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.calvin-c ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.calvin-c ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 787
Karma: 1575310
Join Date: Jul 2009
Device: Moon+ Pro
Quote:
Originally Posted by DawnFalcon View Post
A different account, same address. When Amazon block accounts, they then go ahead and block any account which might possibly be associated with the blocked one.
This makes sense to me. Since members of the same household often share their accounts (not always, but if you can figure out a way to tell when they do vs when they don't, I'd like to hear it) it makes sense to treat the group as a 'household' account.

My suggestion is, if you have people living at home for which you don't want to take financial responsibility, establish separate addresses for them. Not that I know of any way to force them to use those addresses, except possibly to return any mail for them that's delivered to *your* address. And there are undoubtedly possible bureaucratic obstacles to doing this-here it's a simple as adding a 'room number' to the address.

Amazon *might* still treat it as a household group, but IMO they'd be more likely to treat it as an apartment house with that sort of address.
calvin-c is offline   Reply With Quote