View Single Post
Old 05-21-2007, 09:16 AM   #17
yvanleterrible
Reborn Paper User
yvanleterrible ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.yvanleterrible ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.yvanleterrible ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.yvanleterrible ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.yvanleterrible ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.yvanleterrible ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.yvanleterrible ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.yvanleterrible ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.yvanleterrible ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.yvanleterrible ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.yvanleterrible ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
yvanleterrible's Avatar
 
Posts: 8,616
Karma: 15446734
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Que Nada
Device: iPhone8, iPad Air
If my memory serves me right gray levels are achieved by partly rotating bi colored particles.
Putting multiple colo(u)rs on the same particle would defeat the whole concept of colo(u)r displaying because each colo(u) has to be dosed grayscale style to work effectively; making this thought next to impractical.

An other concept against multiple colo(u)r particles is that if you think at it closely again, when a bicolored particle displays a gray tone it is rotated partly upwards ie. if a colo(u)r particle was there instead, it would show.
yvanleterrible is offline   Reply With Quote