View Single Post
Old 12-18-2009, 05:51 PM   #23
calvin-c
Guru
calvin-c ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.calvin-c ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.calvin-c ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.calvin-c ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.calvin-c ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.calvin-c ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.calvin-c ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.calvin-c ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.calvin-c ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.calvin-c ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.calvin-c ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 787
Karma: 1575310
Join Date: Jul 2009
Device: Moon+ Pro
Quote:
Originally Posted by DawnFalcon View Post
And in many cases, that's a crime with substantial penalties attached.
I don't think so, in most cases at least. On the part of the seller, it's possibly a violation of the contract. (Depends on how the restrictions were 'gotten around'. Even if all the contract says is "thou shalt not sell to foreign buyers" it usually doesn't require super-secure precautions. The usual standard of due diligence is whether or not the seller has taken reasonable precautions, e.g. checking the address/phone/credit card.)

On the part of the buyer, it's possibly providing false information-but in most jurisdictions I'm familiar with that's only a crime when it's provided to authorities (and even then, often only in a sworn statement).

The closest crime I can think of is fraud-and since the buyer is paying for the product I'm not sure that fraud would fit either. (I'm sure the buyer could be charged with fraud, I'm just not sure (s)he would be convicted.)
calvin-c is offline   Reply With Quote