View Single Post
Old 12-17-2009, 06:57 PM   #63
fugazied
Wizard
fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.
 
fugazied's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,305
Karma: 1958
Join Date: Jan 2009
Device: iPod Touch
Quote:
Originally Posted by =X= View Post
I see so making books affordable is an attack on literature. FAIL

It is when authors/publishers/retailers are more concerned about $ than writing that is the true attack on literature.
I agree 100% Publishers wouldn't care if only 1 person could afford to read if the books sold for 10 million dollars each.

They don't care about making books cheaply available. In countries like Australia they charge $30 for a paperback and publishers viciously thought against proposals which allowed for cheaper imported books. Again with the same tired arguments, 'it hurts literature, it hurts authors'. They want super expensive books, they don't believe cheaper books means more readers and more profits.

They have failed to fully appreciate the fact that in 5 years the vast majority of people will have an e-reader device in their pocket in the form of a phone or a tablet. People won't need to carry those weighty hardbacks and can read on the run, it's a LOT more potential consumers - people who don't want to lug around paper books .
fugazied is offline   Reply With Quote