View Single Post
Old 12-16-2009, 05:12 PM   #7047
wodin
Illiterate
wodin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wodin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wodin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wodin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wodin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wodin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wodin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wodin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wodin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wodin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.wodin ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
wodin's Avatar
 
Posts: 10,279
Karma: 37848716
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Sandwich Isles
Device: Samsung Galaxy S10+, Microsoft Surface Pro
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparrow View Post
I think that depends on whether the voters agreed to that particular solution to the traffic problem.

Often it's better to not raise these types of issues at all; once the urban planners get going the 'solution' is generally worse than the problem imho.

I used to walk along a busy road that pedestrians found dangerous to cross. The 'solution' wasn't a crossing in a sensible place; it was a mile of barricades shepherding pedestrians to the nearest junction where they could cross in installments when the various traffic lights went red; and then walk the mile back to where they wanted to cross to in the first place.
On most of the busy intersections here there are cross walks on only three of the four streets; saves money to not have to install walk signals on the fourth one. That means if you want to legally get to the bus stop on the other side of the street, you have to wait through three signals; and by that time your bus is long gone!

And the powers that be lament over the high number of pedestrian fatalities!

Last edited by wodin; 12-16-2009 at 09:49 PM. Reason: typos
wodin is offline   Reply With Quote