I dont think it was *that* bad of a review, or rather it was a bad review but I dont think he was too biased. Most of it sounded fair, if slighlty slanted, and a bit sarcastic at times. e.g. "would degrade its precious readability, apparently".
I definitely have the impression he is not the target audience, he is more likely the guy that raised his hand when the editor asked "Who wants to review this new book reader thing?"
KK is mostly right, this type of review will fade away and be replaced, hopefully, with more educated, less biased ones in the future. However, there will always be someone out there that talks out of their posterior when they should probably just shut up. And there will also always be people that legitimately have a difference in opinion, it should be up to us to educate them - or at least try.
I think I'll send him a link to this thread....
