Originally Posted by Kali Yuga
I have to say, while I appreciate the irony and exposure of hypocrisy, I really don't see how this is a criticism of copyright per se. If anything, this is an argument in favor of copyright, as the aggrieved artists are using copyright laws in order to redress numerous contract/copyright violations by the music industry.
You don't see the problem with their liability being twice their global yearly turnover? This has the possibility to break them, just as they've used statutory damages to break people.
And at this point, let em burn.