View Single Post
Old 12-05-2009, 11:40 AM   #312
zerospinboson
"Assume a can opener..."
zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.zerospinboson ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
zerospinboson's Avatar
 
Posts: 755
Karma: 1942109
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Local Cluster
Device: iLiad v2, DR1000
Quote:
Originally Posted by HarryT View Post
Having read the draft legislation; yes, I do. There's been a lot of "scare-mongering" about it, but it does appear to offer entirely adequate safeguards.
And how, pray tell, is it that you get to read drafts of secret treaties? Personally, from what little info there is on ACTA, most of the parties involved with drafting the treaty are pro-IPR, which sort of implies that if you have access to it, you've likely also pro-IPR. Given your post history, the latter doesn't seem unlikely, but the question is why they would give you access.
In any case, I'm afraid it comforts me very little to hear you say "there appear to be entirely adequate safeguards;" considering your opinion on HADOPI-1, which you also felt was "fair", while it was resoundingly rejected by the constitutional court. Odd, that.
Still, I'm curious what information you base your opinion on, seeing how you so strongly assert that you've read drafts.
zerospinboson is offline   Reply With Quote