|
I'm no longer really sure the FCC correspondence is related to the delays, now that I've read a bit more on the FCC filing and the correspondence.
While it sounds like they are talking about getting the device authorized, that has already happened. You can track down the information and even see the authorization grant via the FCC website as well, since the FCC ID can be used to search for the grant.
What is really going on here is that apparently B&N submitted its SAR information in a format that the FCC doesn't like. A group like the FCC wants everything reported the same way, so you can actually do a quick at-a-glance comparison. It makes their jobs easier. It's looking like the correspondence is about getting this information to the FCC in the right format.
The paragraphs about 'denying the authorization' looks to be part of a standard form, and isn't surprising. If a company doesn't respond after a month or so, the FCC has to assume they either can't or won't respond, and can revoke the grant.
|