View Single Post
Old 12-03-2009, 06:30 PM   #240
fugazied
Wizard
fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.
 
fugazied's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,305
Karma: 1958
Join Date: Jan 2009
Device: iPod Touch
Quote:
Originally Posted by Icarusbop View Post
Not so I'm afraid:
Look up the
'Oregon Petition' 19,700 against and
'The Global Warming Petition Project' 31,486 againt
I have a masters degree and a basic knowledge of science, that is all that is required to sign the 'The Global Warming Petition Project'. I am not a specialist in the field of climatology yet I could both of those petitions. You need to look at the numbers of publishing climatologists who are actively researching the climate change. Anything else is just willful ignorance.

I am sorry, I don't CARE what a Veterinarian, Medical doctors, weatherman, mechanical engineer says about climate change. I want to hear publishing climatologists who research the subject.

It is just madness to even consider those petitions as proof of a massive number of climate change 'scientists' disagreeing with the premise of global warming. Look at the real peer reviewed published science for a change, the stuff climatologists publish, not the Fox news weatherman's blog.
fugazied is offline