[XNN]

Originally Posted by Dulin's Books

-True to a point , the root of the dissent is in how much effect it has etc and the physics of the assertions by the climate scientists have been calle din question
http://icecap.us/images/uploads/Fals...ion_of_CO2.pdf

I tried to wade through the Gerlich and Tscheuschner arXiv article. Long story short, it is gibberish. Reviewing the trusty atmospheric radiation textbook seems to confirm that story. A link to what seems like a reasonable arXiv response that fits my admittedly rusty knowledge can be found here:

http://rabett.blogspot.com/2008/02/a...now-about.html
http://arxiv.org/abs/0802.4324

I notice that the "CO2-increase-lags-temperature-increase-thus-violating-causality" argument has been raised a few times here. A simple rebuttal of this idea can be found in a somewhat unlikely spot here:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/1.3192838
http://home.cc.umanitoba.ca/~woodbur/OCCAMforTLE-1.pdf