Quote:
Originally Posted by kennyc
I agree it is important to understand the background and research areas and potential motivations of anyone seeking a public forum, but don't feel that has any real relevance on the validity of the work, provided it follows the established scientific method and science processes - peer review, etc.
|
That is interesting because your rebuke of the list of links Dulin's Books provided centred almost solely on the researchers themselves, their backgrounds, areas of speciality, their "motives" and backing parties rather than the work itself and whether it had any validity.
In fact, your response read almost like you had not bothered to actually read the links but had simply spent time investigating the background of the scientists involved.
Cheers,
PKFFW