Quote:
Originally Posted by Ralph Sir Edward
No it's not about duplicating the Earth,
...
Now I have provided more information, described more limitations to the data, described the gaps in the logic chain, and carefully explained why I consider the current Global Warming worldview too uncertain to be making policy decisions affecting billion of current lives. What has been your response?
Nothing. ...
Scientists said it.
I believe it.
That ends it.
Well, I heard that as a kid with one word changed. (I'll leave the word to the discerning reader....)
Oh yes, and calling me a liar and a fool...
|
No Ralph, your the one that said we have to replicate the Earth and that the results otherwise were bogus.
As far as YOUR data, many others have raised exactly the same issues and they have been addressed by the climate scientists who all agree that it has been considered in the results.
I have no requirement to debate you on this - it is not my science or my publication (despite the fact that I agree with it). You are perfectly welcome to your opinion. If you are so certain it negates the published conclusions then certainly you should be working to present that to the world.
As far as your analogy you miss one very important point that I've made repeatedly. Scientists are not perfect, nor are all of them right all of the time, but Science IS. It is Science that says this about Global Warming and yes I believe it. Science is the ultimate and best tool we have to understand the world around us.
I'm not sure if you are accusing me of calling you names, but I have not and will not. I respect you as an individual but your opinion on this issue is wrong.