View Single Post
Old 12-01-2009, 08:00 PM   #248
Sonist
Apeist
Sonist ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sonist ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sonist ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sonist ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sonist ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sonist ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sonist ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sonist ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sonist ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sonist ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Sonist ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Sonist's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,126
Karma: 381090
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The sunny part of California
Device: Generic virtual reality story-experiential device
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moejoe View Post
What really amazes me is that anybody would pay for anything at all nowadays. I mean, I can only imagine that people are paying now out of some antiquated sense of honour; or misguided belief that it actually means a damn thing to the creators....
Most people will pay for good content and good design, and for convenience. This is how iTunes works.

In fact, I don't think Amazon is far off the mark, as many of the titles I've purchased seem to be about $6-7, which for a good portion of purchasers, would invite at least some impulse shopping, when combined with the convenience of instant acquisition. DRM is the main drawback for me, because it still takes a little effort to strip the DRM (and to download a sample, to make sure it's not Topaz.)

You'll never stop "piracy," but this has never been the case before - some copied audio and video tapes, some photocopied books. For all desirable stuff, there was always a balance, at a certain price-point, where enough potential purchasers bought a title, for the content creators to realize profit.

What this contemplated treaty appears to attempt, is to tip the balance in favor of the content creators, in what is essentially a non-competitive market field.

So, not only would corporate interests police our internet use, but without the threat of "piracy," they can more freely engage in price-gouging.
Sonist is offline   Reply With Quote