Quote:
Originally Posted by Dulin's Books
That is the way it is supposed to work. What you seem to be missing is that theses scientists have not been playing the same game.
They have(according to their own writings and the data uncovered with the leak) altered their data, altered their conclusions, colluded in reviewing each other's work when its supposed to be "anonymous/double blind" peer review, colluded to be the "anonymous peers" who reviewed work by others that didnt support theirs so they could squash it, edited dissenting opinions in the IPCC report to give them less weight, attempted to intimidate the Journals themselves to keep a lid on dissenting work, taken money for work they never did and destroyed data/emails and made other plans and schemes trying to avoid FOI requests.
They have subverted the whole process of peer review for their own ends and all of their work and that of others who used their data and their models is now properly in dustbin where it belongs. That includes the IPCC reports.
|
I assume you are including ALL climate scientists and ALL journals in your assertion.
I don't believe it for a second.
If (like Ralph) you have proof of this then please take it to the journals the respectable climate scientists. It will be fixed.
Here's another thing that people seem to forget.
Is science perfect? are the people conducting science perfect?
<sarcasm answer>No they're just forgiven.</sarcasm answer>
No. Neither science or scientists are perfect but the scientific method IS. If there is deception or cheating it will be revealed. That is the whole point of repeatability and replicablity of experiments.