View Single Post
Old 11-29-2009, 04:35 PM   #92
fugazied
Wizard
fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.fugazied once ate a cherry pie in a record 7 seconds.
 
fugazied's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,305
Karma: 1958
Join Date: Jan 2009
Device: iPod Touch
Quote:
Originally Posted by scveteran View Post
There are many scientist who disagree with you. A large part of why there are not articles being published that refute the theory of man causing global warming is that there has been a tremendous effort to censor anyone who disagrees with the established point of view.

As far as it being a case of science vs ignorance, I think you are buying into the hype because you don't understand the science yourself. It makes you feel good to insult those who disagree with you. Good luck with that approach.
There are NOT many scientists disagreeing with me. 97% of climatologists who hold a PhD and publish scientific papers say global warming is occurring.

That is called a consensus. Conservatives and skeptics with vested interests might be interested in hearing what 'weathermen' think about the issue or scientists from fields other than climatology who don't publish scientific papers dealing with climatology, but it is smarter and more rational to listen to the REAL scientists. They have known about it for 20 years, the general public is just catching up.

Yes it is ignorance to choose to believe a weatherman or conservative talk show host over a climatologist. Willful ignorance.
fugazied is offline