View Single Post
Old 11-29-2009, 12:21 AM   #75
Ham88
Zealot
Ham88 has learned how to read e-booksHam88 has learned how to read e-booksHam88 has learned how to read e-booksHam88 has learned how to read e-booksHam88 has learned how to read e-booksHam88 has learned how to read e-booksHam88 has learned how to read e-booksHam88 has learned how to read e-books
 
Ham88's Avatar
 
Posts: 134
Karma: 994
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Maine, United States
Device: Ectaco Jetbook
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffC View Post
As with everything there is data providing useful clues and ammunition for both sides of the spectrum; believers/non-believers/who-knowers....

After all, at this moment in time, it is still just a theory....
You point out that is just a theory, the problem with this is that much of what makes up science are theories, like Einsteins theory of relativity, it still a theory though last I checked no one was arguing its credibility.

Quote:
Originally Posted by scveteran View Post
They show that these scientist have not only worked to keep other scientist who disagreed with them from being published. They also showed that the scientist massaged the data to show what they wanted. This included talking about hiding the decline in temperatures the last couple of years.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn11074
Hmm this article, though dated, seems to show the exact opposite of what you're saying. Additionally here is an article from the NY Times which seems to explain away much of what you've been saying http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/21/sc...warming&st=cse
Ham88 is offline