View Single Post
Old 11-28-2009, 10:03 AM   #74
GeoffC
Chocolate Grasshopper ...
GeoffC ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffC ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffC ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffC ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffC ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffC ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffC ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffC ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffC ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffC ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.GeoffC ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
GeoffC's Avatar
 
Posts: 27,599
Karma: 20821184
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Scotland
Device: Muse HD , Cybook Gen3 , Pocketbook 302 (Black) , Nexus 10: wife has PW
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparrow View Post
Is there a source for this?
Most of what I've read suggests CO2 is an important factor.
E.g. according to the 'Brittanica Guide to Climate Change' (2008) -
"Of the greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide is most significant ... The total radiative forcing by anthropogenic CO2 emissions since the beginning of the industrial age is approximately 1.66 watts per square metre."

Has scientific opinion changed recently?

Co2 is an important gas, but others, such as methane are more important because they absorb more heat at lower concentration. Water vapour is, perhaps, of greater significant because it also generates heat as clouds form.
GeoffC is offline