View Single Post
Old 11-23-2009, 01:32 PM   #7
ahi
Wizard
ahi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ahi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ahi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ahi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ahi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ahi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ahi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ahi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ahi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ahi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.ahi ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,790
Karma: 507333
Join Date: May 2009
Device: none
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jellby View Post
I don't think there's any agreed-upon legally-binding definition of "embedding". You could claim including the fonts in an ePUB (without obfuscation) is embedding, and not redistribution. Sure, the user can unzip the file, but you could argue that's "circumventing" and "hacking", in normal usage, fonts in an ePUB file are only usable for viewing that file.
I think the only question of consequence is: will a multi-million dollar corporation sue you, if you do X? I suspect if they do, even ultimately winning the lawsuit will do little to "dull the pain", so to speak.

So I personally do not see the lack of "agreed-upon legally-binding definition" as being in any way to the benefit of an eBook creator.

- Ahi
ahi is offline   Reply With Quote