Quote:
Originally Posted by DawnFalcon
I understand perfectly. You, by your own admission, you haven't looked into why the other companies I mentioned had issues, and seen what their practices were generally called. Again, you're defending business practices which are downright unpleasant. The only real question is how much more validation you'll give to my point now.
|
I admitted that I didn't know anything about the other companies. Then I went and read up on them. SO I do know about them now and before I made the other post. So I do know about them both now and when I made that other post.
I am not defending those practices. What I am doing is saying that what Amazon is doing has nothing to do with the other companies. Just because you think it does, does not make it so. One is open and up front about their cost and polices. The other is not. No comparison at all.
Contrary to what you said, you obviously do not understand at all. If you did, you would not keep saying that I am defending things that I am not defending. It is just like if I said because you as a citizen of the UK and get much of your food from the ocean, that you are supporting the pirates that plague us today. In reality they have nothing to do with each other. The same with the claim that I am supporting a different company. It has nothing to do with Amazon.
I actually give you no more validation for one simple reason. Nothing you have said is based on logic.