Not wanting things to be run by the government would be fine if the alternative was a reasonable one, but can you honestly say that a system run by companies who only want to make a profit and need to refuse as many claims as possible or refuse coverage to potentially expensive customer in order to make those profits is a system that is working?
Incidentally, maybe I missed something, but wasn't the bill that got through the house one that included a public option i.e. nobody was forced to use the government-run part of the system if they didn't need/want to?
|