Quote:
Originally Posted by DawnFalcon
Privity, a lack of interest in hacking 360's and waiting six months, a lack of interest in taking expensive court cases and a lack of interest of pandering to trolls. I've linked this stuff... "The principle of freedom of contract can no longer be said to justify using standard terms to take away protection consumers would otherwise enjoy."
|
So the very industry you are involved in is being "screwed over by MS" and yet you have no interest in taking a seemingly slamdunk open and shut case action to stop them?
Seems a little fishy to me!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DawnFalcon
It's not its job. I've said several times that that the OFT does not proactively chase offenders for contract violations, it's simply not how it works - the complaint has to be taken up by an affected end-user!
|
So it would be the job of the OFT to order MS to remove the offending T&C's if there is a complaint by an end-user?
Strangely enough though, even with "mass bannings of innocent people" not a single person has complained to the OFT and the OFT have done not a single thing about these "automatically unfair" T&C's!
Oh yeah, I remember, every single "innocent bystander wrongly banned" has decided to appeal to MS first and not say anything to any official body or make any official complaints until they hear back from MS!
Uh-huh!
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DwanFalcon
And right, you really really want me to shut up and shill. I get it, you don't need to keep repeating it.
|
No, now it is becoming too much fun watching you duck and weave and try to change your argument again and again whilst still desperately hoping everyone will just say "oh DawnFalcon please bless us with your secret society, private forum, must knock three times and know the secret handshake to get it, information! We are so desperate to hear more of your unsupported and unsubstantiated claims!"
Cheers,
PKFFW