Quote:
Originally Posted by DawnFalcon
Oh sure PJFFW, I could just lie instead of using the information I had, to appear more of a corperate shill. Or I could tell the truth. Hmm...
|
Or you could just say "here's what I heard, it may or may not be true and as I'm not going to back it up with any evidence you all can take it how ever you like". Rather than trying to put it forward as some sort of indisputable fact and then getting all huffy when people don't fall all over themselves to congratulate you on "sharing" your non-verified claims.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DawnFalcon
It's quite clear that the T&C and EULA for XBL breaches those sections, even a casual reading reveals these issues if you'd bother to check (indeed, it immediately fails the requirement for plain English and is in trouble on that alone). Given Microsoft have knowingly acted according to their interpretation, which breaches several terms, there is no possible defence. Sooner or later someone is going to call them on it, too.
|
According to you and which judge?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by DawnFalcon
And no, contracts are not "assumed" to be legal under UK law... (There is no assumption at all, it's between the two parties and their claims, exclusively...ahh, really cba to explain to you)
|
You finally get something right! It is between the two parties and their claims! That's what I've been saying all along!
It isn't ruled illegal just because you say it is based on your limited understanding of how the law works. Instead, it is argued out
between the two parties in a court of law!
Cheers,
PKFFW