[DawnFalcon]

No, it wasn't. You're simply a troll assigning the worst possible values to anyone's actions. It won't be a surprise to anyone reasonable that sometimes the sources people have can't be disclosed.

You've also managed to spin yourself into a corner. Those terms are allways unfair. The only defence is that they can try and argue that they're not actually the same as the unfair terms, if the terms are indeed those in that list then they are unfair - period. And note that it dosn't mean other terms cannot be (and are often are) ruled unfair, but there are possible arguments against them being unfair. More, the contract would need to be revised based on both the advertising (which has created a "reasonable expectation", in law) and the T&C's. One does not exclude the other from being an issue.

And your persistant insistance that something is legal simply because there is no court ruling against it is frankly sad, especially in a civil legal system not set up to proactively hunt violations.