|
I edited some of the more inflamatory material, because I'm trying not to sink to your level.
No, it's your contention and now I'm going to point to it and grin. Because I never contended anything of the sort, so you only place it could come from is you. Now, you can explain where you came up with it from in UK law.
And you are still persisting in refusing at all costs to admit how UK contract law works. It's based on plain language and simplicity - the unfair terms are there, and anything which fits them and the easily-readable guidence you can do something about, if you so wish. Simply because nobody has not yet brought the specific case does not make the terms fair! And the advertising is part of it, as it allways has been, creating direct consumer expectations does indeed generate implicit rights.
And of course I haven't provided specific links to the laws. No. You keep on believing that.
|