Quote:
Originally Posted by PKFFW
... there being a good argument for something does not mean that the law will agree anyway.
...
|
Ah, but many a EULA provision has been invalidated based on "a good argument." In a court of law. That's the whole point.
It's a balance. And I'd be surprised, if MS doesn't get sued over this, and settle.
It really was a stupid move, kind of like Amazon's deletion of content was, a few months ago.
And just curious, what exactly are you arguing for? Some weird form of a "free market," where seller/provider terms make law, without any consumer protection, and I suppose, without anti-trust scheme?