View Single Post
Old 04-15-2007, 08:53 AM   #54
rlauzon
Wizard
rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.rlauzon put the bomp in the bomp-a-bomp-a-bomp.
 
rlauzon's Avatar
 
Posts: 1,018
Karma: 67827
Join Date: Jan 2005
Device: PocketBook Era
Quote:
Originally Posted by alex_d
First thing i'd like to say is that when it comes to reading, I don't understand why anyone would want to hold on to the stuff for very long. Especially SA. You read it, you've read it, you read something else.
Because some material is so good, that you want to read it again and again and again. Many years ago, I used to re-read the Lord of the Rings at least once a year - and every time I read it, I discovered something different.

You are correct about magazines, though. They tend to be timely and age very quickly. Specialty technical magazines may be an exception, though.

Quote:
Originally Posted by alex_d
Music, of course, is much different. Now i'm not saying subscriptions (and by definition the content has to expire) are the perfect solution.
Subscriptions are not even a very good solution. Subscriptions are good for the consumer only if new, good content is being created regularly. Otherwise, your subscription is a really good value only while you are grabbing the old, good content.

And we've all seen how good the entertainment industry is at creating new, good content.
rlauzon is offline   Reply With Quote