View Single Post
Old 11-08-2009, 08:33 PM   #110
CallOfCth'reader
Cultist
CallOfCth'reader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CallOfCth'reader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CallOfCth'reader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CallOfCth'reader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CallOfCth'reader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CallOfCth'reader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CallOfCth'reader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CallOfCth'reader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CallOfCth'reader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CallOfCth'reader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.CallOfCth'reader ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
CallOfCth'reader's Avatar
 
Posts: 196
Karma: 8624438
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: UK
Device: Sony PRS 505, Kobo Mini, Kobo Glo, Kobo Forma, Kindle DX
Quote:
Originally Posted by desertgrandma View Post
You are correct. I would imagine that if the US Military comes to the conclusion that it was a religious/muslim motive, you'd have the same trouble accepting that....and wonder secretly if there wasn't' a little racism involved.
Why would there have been rascism involved? Race has nothing to do with a person's faith.

But no, I would tend to believe the military investigators final conclusions, as they have nothing to gain with any bias: if they say he snapped the army could have accusations thrown that they never supported one of their troops during emotional crisis, but if he was classed as a terrorist then the army might be criticised for not spotting someone so 'obvious'. The army doesn't 'win' with either way, which is why I assume that the final conclusion will be as accurate as possible.
CallOfCth'reader is offline