View Single Post
Old 11-06-2009, 06:00 AM   #51
jbjb
Somewhat clueless
jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 773
Karma: 9999999
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdurrant View Post
Again, this isn't a patent case. It's a breech of contract case.

For B&N to win, they just have to have convincing evidence that they were working on the nook with substantially the same features as it has now, BEFORE they signed the NDA.
Understood.

I just get enormously irritated by the US patent system, and I lack the will power to resist any slight opportunity to rant about it.

/JB
jbjb is offline   Reply With Quote