View Single Post
Old 11-04-2009, 12:07 PM   #35
jbjb
Somewhat clueless
jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.jbjb ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 772
Karma: 9999999
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: UK
Device: Kindle Oasis
Quote:
Originally Posted by pilotbob View Post
This is a perversion on the Patent system.
I'm not saying it's desirable (or not), simply that in practice you can effectively patent an idea. Patents will cover the idea, while copyright will cover specific expressions of that idea.

Quote:
Also, you can't patent something the is obvious or and obvious combination or other patented things.
Sadly, the people at the various national patent offices who are making the decision about what is or is not obvious to someone "skilled in the art" are not usually themselves skilled in the appropriate art, so very many patents are granted for things which are screamingly obvious.

/JB
jbjb is offline   Reply With Quote