View Single Post
Old 11-03-2009, 08:40 PM   #21
dmikov
Addict
dmikov has learned how to read e-booksdmikov has learned how to read e-booksdmikov has learned how to read e-booksdmikov has learned how to read e-booksdmikov has learned how to read e-booksdmikov has learned how to read e-booksdmikov has learned how to read e-booksdmikov has learned how to read e-books
 
dmikov's Avatar
 
Posts: 257
Karma: 960
Join Date: Dec 2006
Device: REB1200; REB2150; Sony 500/350; EZReader; IREX DR800SG; Nook/Color
Quote:
Originally Posted by Faenad View Post
yes, screw all small companies and small start-up! How dare they sue such a big corporation as B&N anyway?

Joke aside, why being so fast in reaching conclusions? I really wonder why there is so much hype about B&N and the nook, after all the device is not yet released and nobody except B&N have been able to use it. It can still be a lame horse.

Now B&N just have to prove that they were already developing a dual-screen reader prior to being showed the Spring dual-screen Reader under a NDA. If they are in their right it should be easy enough.
No don't screw the small companies. I might be wrong here, but their announcement of their reader next day after B&N announced theirs with a shipping date (i.e. They have a product) and the 3 year startup doesn't. Well that just looked fishy. Plus if you read their first post the phrase patented dual screen technology, just screamed lawsuit 2 weeks ago.
Reading the materials, well android based, that was discussed here for months and only can openers are not coming with android in the next year. And they also disclosed that the e-reader will have cover and now appalled that nook will have cover too... Really?
They might be the small underdog abused by big bully B&N, yeah I give it one chance in ten.
dmikov is offline   Reply With Quote