Thread: Spring Design sues Barnes & Noble over the Nook
View Single Post
Old 11-03-2009, 08:29 PM   #19
pilotbob
Grand Sorcerer
pilotbob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pilotbob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pilotbob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pilotbob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pilotbob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pilotbob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pilotbob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pilotbob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pilotbob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pilotbob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.pilotbob ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
pilotbob's Avatar
 
Posts: 19,832
Karma: 11844413
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tampa, FL USA
Device: Kindle Touch
Quote:
Originally Posted by Faenad View Post
Now B&N just have to prove that they were already developing a dual-screen reader prior to being showed the Spring dual-screen Reader under a NDA. If they are in their right it should be easy enough.
Why? NDA means "Non Disclosure Agreement". If they didn't disclose Spring Design's plans to anybody then they didn't violate the NDA.

BOb
pilotbob is offline   Reply With Quote