View Single Post
Old 11-03-2009, 02:24 PM   #169
JasonB
Connoisseur
JasonB is as sexy as a twisted cruller doughtnut.JasonB is as sexy as a twisted cruller doughtnut.JasonB is as sexy as a twisted cruller doughtnut.JasonB is as sexy as a twisted cruller doughtnut.JasonB is as sexy as a twisted cruller doughtnut.JasonB is as sexy as a twisted cruller doughtnut.JasonB is as sexy as a twisted cruller doughtnut.JasonB is as sexy as a twisted cruller doughtnut.JasonB is as sexy as a twisted cruller doughtnut.JasonB is as sexy as a twisted cruller doughtnut.JasonB is as sexy as a twisted cruller doughtnut.
 
JasonB's Avatar
 
Posts: 92
Karma: 15000
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Toronto, Canada
Device: Sony PRS-505
I'll admit that I only read the first and last pages of discussion here - I skipped over the middle 10 pages. So, what I'm about to say may or may not have been said. It probably has been, but I'm going to say it anyway just because I feel the need to respond regardless. <grin>

If we come up with a different word to describe reading on a screen rather than a book - then we can follow that argument to include reading a magazine, a billboard, text on a TV, text on vehicles that are moving swiftly by us, etc.

I find the whole question and debate pretty much a non-issue. In my opinion, there's absolutely no reason to introduce a new word at all. (Unless you think it might be "cool" - but that's not a good reason.) We read the same way regardless of what medium it is that we're reading. I can think of no good reason to introduce another word just for this one particular medium (as opposed to any others).
JasonB is offline   Reply With Quote