View Single Post
Old 11-02-2009, 12:52 AM   #148
Donnageddon
Now you lishen here...
Donnageddon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Donnageddon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Donnageddon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Donnageddon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Donnageddon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Donnageddon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Donnageddon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Donnageddon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Donnageddon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Donnageddon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Donnageddon ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Donnageddon's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,494
Karma: 479498
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Seattle-ish
Device: Sony PRS-650. Kobo Touch, Kindle Fire
Quote:
Originally Posted by danbloom View Post
do I come across as a bit of a crank here? Could be. Just wondering because just today some highfalutin writer at TIME magazine told me I was full of sh*t and a crank to boot, regarding my ideas about pbooks and ebooks, and the never the twain shall meet refrain that some people accuse me of using as a mantra. Which of course is not true: the twain has met, pbooks have met ebooks and all is well. At least that's how I see it.
Do you mean crank as in: "an annoyingly eccentric person; also : one who is overly enthusiastic about a particular subject or activity"?

Perhaps, but then this forum is filled with cranks.

But you are a bit of a "name-dropper" (ie, "some highfalutin writer at TIME magazine told me") Not an attractive trait, for a crank.

Quote:
But is it wrong -- or even threatening? -- to just think about a new word maybe for reading on screens, not in a negative or perjorative way, but just in a different way. And vive la difference, no?
Not wrong or threatening, as far as I am concerned. Silly, and smacks of attempting to marginalize an activity as innocent as reading.

Combined with your preconceived notion that ereading is detrimental to critical thinking, I find it less than sincere, and just an attempt to differentiate paper reading from reading from a reading device in order to claim such an imagined difference is damaging.

Come to think of it, I think the Time's writer had a point.
Donnageddon is offline   Reply With Quote