View Single Post
Old 10-31-2009, 08:51 AM   #46
charleski
Wizard
charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.charleski ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,196
Karma: 1281258
Join Date: Sep 2009
Device: PRS-505
Quote:
Originally Posted by ProDigit View Post
The resolution is higher than ebook readers, most likely greater than 1024x720 pix, but I have no concrete numbers.
It's a 13.1" screen and seems to be 16:9 aspect ratio.

For that to have a resolution of 170dpi, which is comparable to current eInk readers, it would have to be at least 1941x1091.

Unlikely.

LCD is a very mature technology will well-tuned manufacturing processes and you can't get a 13" LCD that's over 1440x900. It's larger than the top end of current eInk displays, but larger invariably translates into lower dpi resolution because size multiplies the difficulties in quality control. And in terms of the readability of text, it's the dpi that counts, not the total pixel count.
charleski is offline   Reply With Quote