View Single Post
Old 10-29-2009, 10:46 AM   #39
Dave_S
What Title ?
Dave_S ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dave_S ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dave_S ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dave_S ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dave_S ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dave_S ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dave_S ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dave_S ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dave_S ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dave_S ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.Dave_S ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,325
Karma: 1856232
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bavaria Germany
Device: Sony Experia Z Ultra
Quote:
Originally Posted by danbloom View Post
My idea is that a new term or word MIGHT be beneficial for scholars studying the issues involved. Does that make my question more clear?
That still does not require a new word, just an additional word to define what type of reading. The word "read" by itself just means to take in information.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/read

As you can see from Webster's definition, there are many applications of the word "read" and those other applications can just use additional descriptors. For examples in addition to Webster's, a computer can "read a disk" or a pilot can "read the sky" to determine weather conditions.
Dave_S is offline   Reply With Quote