Quote:
Originally Posted by fjtorres
The article is factually correct...
And since they are the ones pushing for its adoption as a counter to big bad evil Amazon they are in fact "developing the epub standard".
Nothing to fault the author for, other than not fully documenting his facts.
But the facts, he's got them right.
|
The article didn't state that Adobe was "developing the ePub standard".
The article says "The ePUB standard, developed by Adobe.." which is not a fact, and the writer did not get it right.
They did not develop the ePub standard. This isn't a matter of semantics, it is a matter of proper credit and attribution, and laziness/lack of research on the part of the Engadget writer.