View Single Post
Old 10-21-2009, 01:11 PM   #10
Superlucky
Fanatic
Superlucky shares his or her toysSuperlucky shares his or her toysSuperlucky shares his or her toysSuperlucky shares his or her toysSuperlucky shares his or her toysSuperlucky shares his or her toysSuperlucky shares his or her toysSuperlucky shares his or her toysSuperlucky shares his or her toysSuperlucky shares his or her toysSuperlucky shares his or her toys
 
Superlucky's Avatar
 
Posts: 581
Karma: 5952
Join Date: Aug 2009
Device: PRS-505, PRS-350
Quote:
Originally Posted by fugazied View Post
Damn lawyers can get blood out of a stone!

I am suprized Amazon didn't include a clause that stipulated the settlement was a secret.
Did you read the article? The guy accidentally dropped a bag containing his Kindle from about 2 feet and the damn thing broke! Amazon wanted to charge him $200 + the broken unit to replace it! Considering the advertisement depicting an unprotected Kindle repeatedly falling 3 feet and bouncing I find it hard to grumble about him asking for $400. This is a case of blatant false advertising. Amazon is no stone and $400 isn't even a scratch.
Superlucky is offline   Reply With Quote