View Single Post
Old 10-13-2009, 03:49 PM   #10
bill_mchale
Wizard
bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,451
Karma: 1550000
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Maryland, USA
Device: Nook Simple Touch, HPC Evo 4G LTE
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaggy View Post
I think it was completely intentional.
Why do you think it was intentional? I think that most of the examples given did in fact make copyright holders fear that they were going to loose a significant source of income to copying. In some cases they did.

Quote:
The debate itself may be legitimate, but many of the things being said in defense of that position are absolute nonsense.
Just as there are many nonsense positions being taken by those who support ignoring copyright.

Mind you, I am not arguing for DRM here. I am pointing out that the current paradigm could well be threatened by file sharing copyrighted material.

--
Bill
bill_mchale is offline   Reply With Quote