View Single Post
Old 10-13-2009, 01:24 PM   #78
DMcCunney
New York Editor
DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.DMcCunney ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
DMcCunney's Avatar
 
Posts: 6,384
Karma: 16540415
Join Date: Aug 2007
Device: PalmTX, Pocket eDGe, Alcatel Fierce 4, RCA Viking Pro 10, Nexus 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by pdurrant View Post
It's funny how in nearly 300 years of copyright law, no government has ever reduced the length of copyright. And so it's gone from 14 years to about 120 years.
What incentive would they have to do so?

The original intent of copyright was to provide incentive to creators by giving them exclusive rights to their creations.

You can blame a good bit of current rights changes on DisneyCo, who want to insure Mickey Mouse and friends never enter the public domain. While I understand the motivation, it drags a lot of other rights along in its wake.

My suspicion is that an appropriate solution is a recognition of different rights for individuals vs organizations. For an individual, copyright might be "Life + X years". A corporation like Disney doesn't die, so rights held by them might just be considered in force as long as the corporation still wants them.

I don't care if Disney retains the rights to Mickey and friends. I'd just like other work to eventually lapse into the public domain.
______
Dennis

Last edited by DMcCunney; 10-13-2009 at 03:10 PM.
DMcCunney is offline   Reply With Quote