View Single Post
Old 10-13-2009, 01:06 PM   #6
bill_mchale
Wizard
bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.bill_mchale ought to be getting tired of karma fortunes by now.
 
Posts: 1,451
Karma: 1550000
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Maryland, USA
Device: Nook Simple Touch, HPC Evo 4G LTE
I think that copyright holders may have been unintentionally crying wolf in the past. That being said, I think the current debate about how illegal downloading is damaging the rights of copyright holders is a legitimate one. All the previous technologies were limited, if not in the fidelity of the copy, then certainly in the ability to share. Most people simply were not going to go through the time and effort to make 50 or 100 copies of a TV show they taped.

We are now in a world where flawless copies can be made and shared with extremely little effort on behalf of the file sharer. Yes, there is still a lot of poor pirated copies out there, but increasingly, the copies, particularly for music and books, are high quality copies. Ultimately, these copies will threaten to remove an important incentive for the production and distribution of creative works. Not that we can stop it; we ultimately need to find a new way to compensate artists for their work -- especially when that work becomes popular.

--
Bill
bill_mchale is offline   Reply With Quote