It seems a very strange decision.
Giving the peace prize to an outgoing politician when they have made an outstanding contribution while in office, and actually achieved things, would be the right thing to do.
This seems to have been done in the hope of future actions based on past rhetoric.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nate the great
Do you know that at the very latest, he was only in office for 12 days before they started considering him for the Nobel? And here I thought you were supposed to get awards based on past actions. He hasn't done anything yet.
Is the Nobel basically a popularity contest now?
|